Thursday, March 10, 2011

Does Preparation H Help Lose Inches

La Res Publica deve morire, e non è una famiglia. - Paolo Barnard

The Res Publica must die, and not a family.





had to paralyze the first modern states with currency sovereign in their only legitimate function, which was and still would be in deficit spending to create wealth among citizens, ie full full employment and welfare state. had to do it because otherwise states and citizens would become too powerful, in the North and South, and that the private financial oligarchies could not afford. You've already read them the greatest crime warp and updates what to get what, or how hanno annientato la sovranità sia legislativa che monetaria degli Stati e marginalizzato i cittadini, ponendo fine alla democrazia e conquistando il controllo economico del pianeta a nostro discapito. Ma la cosa che continua a mesmerizzarmi è la semplicità geniale dei due pilastri fondanti di quell’epocale piano sciagurato. Vale la pena illustrarli nei dettagli poiché il vederli da vicino vi renderà ancora più immediata la comprensione di tutto ciò che ho finora scritto su questo tema. E non ultimo vi renderà molto più facile spiegarne i contenuti più controversi al pubblico.

Hanno preso due concetti in apparenza puliti, lampanti, cristallini, cioè che:

La Repubblica è Res Publica, cioè la cosa di tutti, ovvero lo Stato è dei cittadini ed è i cittadini, e questi sono lo Stato.

Il buon bilancio familiare è quello dove prima di spendere si risparmia, dove si guadagna più di quanto si spende, e dove è considerato disastroso il contrario, cioè spendere più di quanto si guadagna, cioè indebitarsi. Uno Stato è esattamente come una famiglia, è virtuoso se guadagna più di quanto spende, ed è indegno se si indebita.

Chi mai può dubitare di quanto scritto sopra? Res Publica: sono 2000 anni che questo concetto è la base stessa del convivere civile. Lo Stato deve guadagnare di più of what you spend, but also a thrush would understand that is the way for economic excellence. No?

No, wrong, all wrong. Indeed, catastrophically wrong. In fact, built on purpose to deceive, and to reach its destruction of modern states in their only legitimate function, that is, again, to spend a coin sovereign deficit in order to create full employment and full Social State.

The concept of Res Publica would have died the instant when Nixon in 1971 marked the final establishment of the modern money, and free from ties with the gold reserves and then be able to be created out of nothing by States and without limits. Prior to that fact States could not spend freely, because in theory for every dollar or pound or mark etc.. who put into circulation, there must be an equal amount of gold in the national coffers. Why? Because the law stipulated that citizens had the right at any time to bring the money in the bank and demand in exchange for pieces of gold, literally. So the gold equivalent to the money in circulation was always there, but it was not easy to obtain it, so states could decide not unexpected expenses at will. Nixon said enough, and unhooked the dollar from gold, so that America could then give money without limits, just inventandoselo from scratch. The other rich nations did the same (It is more complex, but in fact was the case). He was born the modern bank. Large private capital trembled, panic.

Few understand the importance of that landmark move. He changed the history of economics and the very meaning of state after more than two millennia. First, the state and citizens were indeed in the same boat: if it was true that the state bungled with spending too much money, both citizens and the state could go bankrupt (they ran to the bank to demand gold in return for the money in circulation, but if gold was not enough ... bang!) was true that the State should tax their citizens to recover money to spend, because it could not create it from scratch at will Having regard to the bond with the gold, and it was true that if citizens evade taxes the state could be in the green, with the collapse of its functions. So it was true the Res Publica, or the conduct of the State tax was directly linked to the fate of its citizens, and vice versa. But from the moment when the State was allowed to possess currency sovereign released from everything, everything changed. Since then the state broke away from citizenship and had in hand a novel tool with which to govern: inventandoselo could give money, he could then spend a few limitations. Put simply: the state became something of its own with its own portfolio (ie the currency invented out of nowhere and almost unlimited) free from us citizens. We citizens we were no longer the rule. The latter could therefore decide to invest in national infrastructure, in the workplace, in the welfare state, in private productivity as much as he wanted, enriching. Or he could decide to do the opposite, to tax evading money and thus impoverish us a little or a lot. I recall here what has been explained in detail in The greatest crime, namely that when a state spends this kind of debt, it credits the current accounts of citizens increasing, or provides the bonds that do nothing but move money from a citizens' where the current account earns 1% at a gain where the 4, 5 or 6%. Therefore, the cost to the state's debt enriches always people who do not have to ever pay off, because the state's debt is contracted only with himself and is honored by simply uttering the same again to his money (Keynes, Commons, Robinson, Samuelson, Minsky, Godley, Wray, et al.)

clearly two separate entities, state and citizens, the first with a role as a 'midwife' of the latter, and the latter with the power to democratically legitimize its midwife. And what would the citizenship had never been informed of their true function of the state? Obviously, it would ensure that the democratically ruled that the State would spend his money to create public welfare deficit, all of us. Almost without limits. But this would have decreed something else: the end forever the power of large private capital to dominate the economy, ie the world as they would by that time had ever compete with a much stronger and unlimited power, that of States as 'midwives' interest of citizens. Marchionne blabbering his "investment or no investment? And who cares, in a currency sovereign state enterprise engaged in its legitimate functions Mr. Marchionne was asked to continue to walk long and lying flat to the border, where a diligent financier would have maybe added a good kick in his backside, and strength dismissed from work would be used by Fiat program at full employment with a budget in comparison to the investment of Marchionne is a pocket money (Wray, 1998-2011). Banks play dirty and drag us into the financial abyss? Well, it nationalized, managers are sent in domestic prisons, and the sale of bank assets as a good injection of money the state saves the current account, then the credit-hungry organizations and the public creditors / debtors cheated (ie you everything that made the U.S. central bank governor Ben Bernanke, but change the ending for managers and recipients of the trillions of dollars of State Ben promptly issued from nothing, without it collapsing America).

're understanding what was the problem? Forgive the jargon of the moment a journalist, just to be clear: the separation of state money to spend in deficit to sovereign citizens, and citizens across the legitimate earning a profit from that spending, that is the death of the idea Res Publica, he would have the financial power of speculative fucking (True Power) as never before in human history. And this should not be allowed, ever, ever. But never. And so the mantra that the state is us and that if the State s'indebita we therefore we go into debt, was drilled in the skull of every politician, economist, teacher, technocrat, manager, a citizen, by those who have described it the greatest crime, but here, I'll specify better.

The same happened with the absurd notion that a state is just like a family, and should spend or save as a family. We know that this, in the case of modern sovereign state money, is completely false. It found the greatest crime the full technical explanation of why, on the contrary, the state with its own money to spend in deficit and has almost no debt limits. But mind you again to the dangers inherent in the concept state = family paralyze the government coffers in their task of deficit spending per public through a real Psyop, which in the jargon of the intelligence services is a significare Operazione Psicologica di manipolazione di massa. Vengono comunemente impiegate dal dopoguerra, e i casi più noti furono quelli associati al ‘pericolo rosso’ in Italia e in America Latina, alla Guerra al Terrorismo, ma anche all’economia. Nessuna teoria del complotto, al contrario, sono operazioni sofisticatissime citate in infiniti documenti declassificati oggi consultabili nei National Security Archives di Washington. Nel caso in questione si usò il concetto di cui sopra che è di micidiale penetrazione, perché risuona assolutamente plausibile alle orecchie non solo dei politici, ma anche di tutti i cittadini. Ripeto: lo Stato è come una famiglia, deve guadagnare di più di quanto spende, e non deve spendere more than it gains if not s'indebita, and this is a disaster, they said. Logical, no?

But if a crisis hits the country and leads the youth unemployment at 29% as now in Italy? Too bad. The State could come up with is the job that the salaries for those poor guys ... but no! Why the 'family' can not give all the pocket money they like their children, there is a limit. Too bad if an earthquake devastates the Eagle transforming an Italian jewel in a spectrum stuck in the middle of the country with the financial ruin of thousands of mourners. The State could come up with all the money for a full reconstruction of housing, work, artistic, psychological Clooney and without the G8 ... but no! Why the 'family' has budget limitations, even when you pay with tears. So for hospitals, schools, universities, parks, museums, pensions, etc.. etc.. For fifty years many have given up a lot, sometimes swallowed huge tragedy, because we are convinced that in fact this is our country as we are, and how we must deal every night on the kitchen table hoping not to have to say to your children "there is more, this month nothing out pizza," but in reality it means sacrifice of a nation that truncate destinies forever. But it was not true, the state with its own currency should never balance accounts, is not a family.



Now, you need to know who the men who were able to drill into the brain of all those murderous deceit, in order, again, to destroy the power of the state to protect its citizens, in favor of the power of speculative capital to subjugate the people. Are economists, called Lucas, Sargent, Wallace School of Economic NEW CLASSICALS; Wanniski and Gilder are the SUPPLY Siders, Mankiw is the conservative wing of the NEW KEYNESIANS; there Greenspan, the former U.S. Federal Reserve Deus ex Machina. These microeconomic that have invaded the realm of macroeconomics, namely, simplifying, people who had experienced of family budgets or more and who imposed their own theories to macro-states. Obviously not by mistake. Their ideas, sponsored by the billions of big finance capital, have won the battle after the '60s for the domain of finance ministries of our states, the chairs of the economy which then churn out the leaders and technocrats, have convinced us too, and We have taken away the only tool we had to protect ourselves: the separate state by citizens in deficit spending for our welfare.

We could have another life, we have not had it, another state, we have not had. Those of us who lived and suffered terribly from the constant uncertainty, lack of resources, insecurity, humiliation at work, unemployment, social exclusion, neglect of health, it is deception of the "Res Publica, which is like a family." Now you know, released.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Cover Letter For Culinary Arts Students

proiezione: Juarez, la città dove le donne sono usa e getta


Thursday, March 10 the WOMEN of neighborhood committee will screen the documentary film JUAREZ, THE CITY WHERE THE WOMEN ARE DISPOSABLE . Feature film that documents the phenomenon of femicide to Ciudad Juarez (Mexico).

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Wagon Birthday Invites

UNA FATTORIA PER IL FUTURO - PERMACULTURA - SUB ITA (Integrale)

In terms of solutions ...



Rebecca Hosking, known English naturalist documentary, deals with the dependence on fossil hydrocarbons of agro-industrial contemporary.

Video of great impact, said in an autobiographical path by the same author in search of a new production model of his farm in the light of the imminence of peak oil.

Fantastic footage of a sustainable independent dall'agrochimica and fossil fuels (examples of permaculture, vertical farming, vegetable gardens, garden-forest). Interviews with Colin Campbell, Richard Heinberg, Patrick Whitefield, Chris Dixon, Martin Crawford and the children of Arthur Hollins. On the same theme you should read the document of the Post Carbon Institute Concerned Scientists: towards a model independent of fossil fuels "can be downloaded at the following link: www.transitionitalia.it/dohttp://www.blogger.com/post-create . g? blogID = 659062515384348731wnload/la_transizione_agroalimentare.pdf

thanks for the translation into Italian: Agnese Aloise
- Stefania Bottacin - Evelina Dezza - Michael Flament - Deborah Rim Moiso - Dario Tamburrano - Giulio Vignoli who freely cooperated in the network.

Watch the Cuban experience in the subject of peak oil and permaculture

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Blue Ring Around The Color Of The Eye

Il peccato originale del federalismo comunale - di Gianluigi Bizioli





Read article

New Client Welcome Letter Hair Salon



Monday, February 28, 2011

Do Bearded Dragons Ejaculate

proiezione: COME UN UOMO SULLA TERRA




Thursday, March 3 the neighborhood committee will screen the documentary SOLO COME UN UOMO . Il viaggio di un migrante etiope che per arrivare a Roma dovrà affrontare l'inferno libico...
Un ottimo documentario capace di far comprendere a fondo le atroci complicità degli stati europei, per primo quello italiano con Gheddafi ed il suo regime.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Avalanche Bed For Silverado

Paolo Barnard apriamo tutti insieme il capitolo delle soluzioni




I just finished read the latest update - the ninth - of "the greatest crime," Paul Barnard, a journalist whom I admire and respect.

juice upgrade is that what defines Barnard Italy true - the man in the street - did not Over time, the desire and resources to follow the complex reasoning that would lead to understanding the origins of poor living conditions facing and with which he deals daily.
honestly a bit 'I am surprised that Barnard will speak, as if he had ever realized. I remember that he wrote - in reference to Labor - that people do not need to know anything in detail the misdeeds of this or that, and everyone knows that for better or worse and "feel" that something is wrong that not is right, and so on.
then what is it worth talking to an employee of the Euro grill Fini, the Trilateral, Bilderberg, etc. wage deflation.? (Hats off to him anyway done).

Personally, however depressing it may be, consider it a matter of course. It 'a distinctive feature of human psychology that does not want to add more problems - too complex - to those who already faces.

For this reason, or rather also why I support a long time - and I hope it is not the only - that is useless, or at least ineffective, focus on the problems that afflict us.
We need to focus on possible solutions to those problems.

What I mean by "focus on solutions? Obviously there is a problem where there is a solution. Solutions do not mean some abstruse economic formulas. The initial solutions we need are simple, basic.

First of all need a little thinking, as a premise.
The purpose of the human being is happiness - without getting into existential questions, atteniamoci here to the practical sphere.
Happiness is a subjective concept, and can result from several factors, but it certainly needs to be born with a condition: the satisfaction of needs.
Now, the needs of human beings, like those of any other animal, are relatively simple: every man must eat, drink and enjoy good health. In practice the "good health" is divided into: to live in a healthy environment, have access to care if you fall ill, and be able to repair from the elements of nature.
not need anything else, really needs nothing else is talking about.
us living in this sick system, that without the cursed money does not give anything, the real need we have is to ensure compliance with these basic needs. The fear now is precisely that it could not meet these fundamental rights of every human being: fear of not finding a job that allows us to be able to eat or feed our families, fear that it could not "afford" a home where to live, fear that it could not "afford" a future for themselves or their children.

The solutions are then those changes, knowledge / technology or opportunities that would allow us to reclaim the resources needed to meet our basic needs.
This, in my opinion, is the very basis on which to build.
Obviously I'm not saying to focus only on these aspects, it is right and desirable to contextualize our daily reality and understand the factors that create or influence.
But I think it's important to understand that fear of change stems from insecurity and fear of not being able to meet tomorrow - but also in the process of change - those simple needs I listed before.

The priority must be to share knowledge and find the best solutions to various problems, large and small, that we live daily. Always

Barnard concludes the sixth update saying "First thing you do this," referring to an awareness of the causes of the international status quo "then for the solutions we open another chapter. There are."

I think it's time to open this new chapter together.

David B.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Do Corn Tortillas Have Any Nutritional Value?

Venerdì 18 Febbraio


VENERDÌ 18 FEBBRAIO
AL COMITATO DI QUARTIERE  
SERATA INTRODUTTIVA...
MUSICA E PROIEZIONI DA EUSKAL HERRIA
selezione SKA-PUNK-ROCK-

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Portable Dog Fences For Small Dogs

Il domani contiene il cambiamento che desideri, basta volerlo!




Do not ever think that they can not see the change you want. Do not think of having to lay the groundwork now for the change in the distant future. Build today the changes of tomorrow, because the changes happen in a few days in this socio-built.



"When you dream alone is a dream when you dream begins in two reality."



We have little time and a lot of work to do, but just wanting the change that we see in our minds and we feel in our hearts can be conducted on a daily basis, and that change is closer than you think.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Danactive Good For A Diet?

19 FEBBRAIO 2011-Autodeterminazione ora!-




SABATO 19 FEBBRAIO
I COMITATI DI QUARTIERE E LA CONFEDERAZIONE COBAS
presentano una serata di controinformazione sulla questione basca.
In occasione della  quinta settimana di solidarietà   con il popolo basco che si concluderà con la manifestazione nazionale 
February 26 in Milan
invite a representative of IKASLE (student movement) who will talk about organization of the Basque education system and the struggles carried out for a national education system, unitary, popular and free from the interests of capital.
And a representative of the Basque youth movement organization that will speak of the bow, repression and the current situation in Euskal Herria.

A useful opportunity to compare verrà fornito dalla analisi delle lotte contro gli inceneritori sostenute dalla popolazione basca negli ultimi anni che permetterà di confrontare le strategie che dal basso vengono proposte per risolvere il problema.
  CONTESTUALMENTE APERITIVO, BANCHETTO INFORMATIVO, MOSTRA FOTOGRAFICA, VIDEOPROIEZIONI
A SEGUIRE MUSICA DIFFUSA

Dancing For Prlapsed Uterus

I popoli possono autodeterminarsi solo nella misura in cui gli eserciti lo consentono. - D.B.

In a world where "flexibility" seems to have become a value, we should really be "flexible" we should learn to be loving and available to whoever is with us and with whom we do not know, to give confidence ' other, and give him more chances despite his errors to prove his kindness and respect towards us. But if our trust is betrayed, when our love is despised, or worse, if the other a priori acts motivated by feelings of hatred and inequality, of contempt or blind selfishness, then we should become rock hard, react with absolute strength and determination. Because history teaches us that those principles, values, recognized and practiced by us, do not spread yourself like a sweet aroma, but instead must be grown with difficulty that their seed can germinate from the hard earth of this material reality.

Too often - in my opinion - confuse the spiritual world with the material.
This confusion leads us to preach the "turn the other cheek" *, or that "the last shall be first" ** or even, to believe that love will prevail over anything. So many and so great were the teachings of the various mythological figures and recent examples such as Martin Luther King or Gandhi, a great inspiration to the kind hearts, but what remains today of their work? As the seeds that have been thrown in a position to defend themselves from the weather? Unfortunately, those seeds of love not just fall on fertile ground, but also on the thorny, on that rocky road.
The world would not be what it is today if those values \u200b\u200band spiritual principles were enough to change the material reality (and I dare say that anyone who believes otherwise is a victim of ignorance).
Sun Tzu teaches us that to win a battle or war itself we must know our enemy and ourselves.
I think it's just our enemy to have been overlooked in the course of history, and, apparently, to be so today. An enemy that is stated in the material world with violence, and the spiritual with the fear. The Right
who can not or will not, defend themselves from violence is killed, period.
Surely that just become a source of inspiration (spiritual) for the kind hearts and noble minds, but the examples do not provide some tools in order to change a reality dominated and shaped by the will to power and the examples into history.
If we continue, then, to mix the spiritual and material I believe that we will never be able to change reality. Only with extreme actions planned and calculated, and so effective, you can create a society where the values \u200b\u200band principles that we love so much are respected and guaranteed, and not, as is the case today, wanted or claimed.

DB




** 6.29 * Luke Matthew 19.16-29

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Say No Thanks Gracefully

Changing Paradigm




We can not know the world in which children are now beginning their studies will find themselves when they are adults.

For this reason it is essential to provide children's mental tools today that make them able to better address their future.

The school system we know is able to prepare our children to the world in which they live as adults?

to deal successfully with new situations and unexpected is important to think creatively and find innovative ideas, imagine all the possible solutions.

But this approach is not what is applied in the school system, which indeed tends to flatten the creativity insita in ognuno di noi, ad uniformarci secondo un unico standard, a pensare in maniera univoca.

Sir Ken Robinson definisce la creatività come "il processo dell'avere idee originali che hanno valore".

Esse creano l'innovazione che plasma l'evolversi della società.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Can Endstage Liver Disease Be Cured?

LA PRIGIONE INVISIBILE

UN’ ECONOMIA A MISURA DI RIBELLE
DI FEDERICO ZAMBONI

Il libero mercato è il grande alibi del Potere.
Il denaro è il suo strumento fondamentale.
Il lavoro la sua arma di ricatto. La risposta è dare vita a circuiti alternativi e autogestiti

Siamo sotto assedio: assai più che negli scorsi decenni ciascuno di noi, privati all'establishment economic and political foreign nationals is subject to a systematic attack that undermines the very foundations of his life in contemporary society. The summary could be called "Marchionne's strategy, except that in this way you may download a single entity, and on an individual company, the responsibility of a phenomenon far more comprehensive and consistent. Strictly speaking, indeed, it is wrong to even talk about the phenomenon in the sense of something that manifests itself in reality but whose names are yet to be investigated.

In this case, we face the first tangible results, and unambiguous, a design that not only has a lot size wider but mainly based on the logic states so unshakable: the use of employees as the supreme weapon of blackmail, and then the enslavement, against the population.



The reasoning is elementary. Yet it deserves to be spelled out, so be sure to share it. The only thing which can not give up today is a source of income that would at least cover the basic needs, and that source of income that can not be, in most cases, their work, usually in the service of others. What should be a right inherent to their status as citizens and natural aspiration to become part of the community you belong to, turns into a kind of privilege, which will be granted only to those who will try to earn it.

and not so much not only for his professional contribution, as for its total submission to the employer. And, by extension, the interests and dictates of the dictators that are still higher.

Apparently you subscribe to an employment contract. In fact it makes a pledge of allegiance. The subject will bow to her Lord. The Lord, His goodness, allows him to serve.

addition to the basic reasoning is ruthless, but only the naive may surprise: according to traditional precepts dell'iperliberismo, who does not hesitate to sacrifice any ethical principle to achieve the maximum profit, the living conditions of people will be considered only by the impact of causing the economic processes. Individuals, so to speak, are a necessary evil.

whose existence is justified only under certain operational requirements of the cycle of production and consumption. A course that requires them to some extent, but at the same time transcends them. Their

, to put it in technical terms, is a "use value". And being seen as parts of a mechanism, rather than as human beings to be respected as such, and to help develop their skills better further consequence is that they are substantially interchangeable.

From which it follows, among other things, the absolute ease with which they carry out the relocation: the entrepreneur who move plants abroad is not at all interested in the damage to be suffered by his countrymen, but only that the business benefit him may arise. In a nation worthy of the name would be prosecuted for antisocial conduct, or at least, deprived of citizenship in fake nations of today it is considered quite normal and even, as evidenced by its recent history of the Fiat, it raises some questions about how to convince him to reserve some 'work to his countrymen.

A true paradox: at the same time when relations become rigid one-way, dismantling the collective agreements and minimizing regulatory safeguards (up to challenge the delicate and essential area of \u200b\u200bsicurezza1), wears the mask of the overpowering generosity. Not only removes the idea of \u200b\u200bexploitation, but is reversed into the exact opposite. The owner is a benefactor. The worker is your benefit. The salary is a cross between the fee due and regalia, provided by someone at the bottom, and at any time, you may decide to sbaraccare everything and go somewhere. A "benefit" from someone else. Who sells and



buyers in Western societies is more difficult to realize, since the dynamics are fragmented to the point that not everyone can grasp the intimate interconnection, but good to see something happen very similar to that told in John Steinbeck's Grapes of Wrath . Forced to leave Oklahoma in the Great Depression, the Joad family ends up in California and began working for local landowners. Who, not content to pay starvation wages and labor supply on the huge mirror as well, think to complete the work by inducing the workers to stay on their land, of course, four cabins in money and supplies from a store located also in the vicinity of cultivated fields, looks a bit ', owned by the same landlords.

A vicious circle in its own way perfect. The work is underpaid, food and everything else is expensive. Opportunities for profit doubled. First we derive profit from the pay, or on what you buy, then prices of the goods, or on what you sell. The poor remain poor is because they earn little, and because it spends too much. The poor are trapped. If it is not subject to slavery lost livelihoods. If bows his head survives, provided that the hardship is not the breaks, but no longer has any choice. So no autonomy.

Change what must be changed, the current situation is similar. The average citizen is squeezed for the first time in the workplace, and a second when they must provide the goods and services, including any bank financing, you'll need. Or they believe they need, as a result of that additional form of manipulation and subjugation which consists of the induced needs. In other words, he is the victim of a sort of compulsory mediation. It's like taking the owner of the flour mill and then buy bread from him. Too bad that the flour has been forced to sell it cheap, and the bread it pays its weight in gold. This forced

brokerage, which is never discussed e che comunque verrebbe spiegata come l’esito naturale della libera iniziativa e della conseguente divisione dei ruoli, implica la perdita di qualunque controllo sull’organizzazione complessiva. E, dunque, il venir meno di ogni possibilità di sottrarsi alle iniquità che ne scaturiscono. Non solo ci si indebolisce, nello sforzo interminabile di cavarsela e, tutt’al più, di salire qualche gradino sulla scala del benessere. Quel che è peggio, si contribuisce a rendere sempre più forti le oligarchie che tirano i fili, diventandone di fatto i fiancheggiatori, i solerti esecutori, i complici magari involontari ma ugualmente affidabili.

La via d’uscita

Non è ancora un progetto operativo, if not a little. It is not because, to be put into practice and begin to have effect, requires a much higher number of people than those who read regularly and share the Rebel instances. In addition, each of the various groups should be concentrated in one area, so that members can interact with each other in a regular and systematic basis. Creating thus a network of economic relations - including economic - which tend to self-sufficiency.

If this is the ultimate goal, which is well set to learn more where you are going to delude ourselves that we can complete the course, some steps you can move immediately. Or at least tenersi pronti a farlo, come se ci si stesse preparando a un viaggio (una migrazione) che avrà inizio non appena le condizioni generali lo permetteranno.

Proprio come in un viaggio, quindi, i primi atti da compiere riguardano i preliminari. Uno, studiare attentamente le mappe. Due, pianificare la parte logistica. Tre, last but not least, predisporsi mentalmente ad affrontare quello che ci aspetta, immaginando le difficoltà che si incontreranno e le possibili soluzioni.

Fuor di metafora, le mappe sono quelle della realtà economica circostante, a livello sia macro che micro. La logistica riguarda i mezzi materiali e le persone su cui possiamo contare. Lo scopo del viaggio è uscire dal circolo vizioso di cui si è detto: invece di immettere tutti i nostri atti economici nei circuiti già esistenti, pagando pegno alle loro sperequazioni strutturali, vanno creati dei circuiti alternativi che si basino su altri principi e che mirino ad altri risultati, in antitesi alle speculazioni di grande e di piccolo cabotaggio che ormai sono la regola in qualsiasi attività. Una prima ipotesi, per iniziare da qualcosa che dipende solo da noi, è quella di supplire alla carenza di denaro con prestazioni gratuite reciproche. v Beninteso: non in una logica di scambio “uno a uno”, che altrimenti non farebbe che riprodurre lo stesso approccio utilitaristico delle normali transazioni economiche, ma in una prospettiva di supporto disinteressato e amichevole in cui il vero motore is solidarity. Or, rather, the pleasure typical of the gratuity, to do things together for the sake of it. Need a hand? If I can do thee. If and when the positions were to be upset I hope you can do the same. Not to save on the expenditure that should I take to gain the cooperation of a stranger, but to continue to transform the lives watchful dell'ometto liberal generous man in life free.

To many it may seem a mere utopia, but it is only because they are so imbued with a vision economistic impossible to find what should be normal. And that ultimately survives, even if confined to the ever-increasing restricted friendship relations. Or family if the family has kept something healthy.

Conversely, this type of momentum should be recovered not only in the sphere of leisure but also in the work. The truth is, if anything, you have forgotten, is simple and rewarding of loyal people, and not clouded by the desire to earn more money and develop your career at any cost, it works better. We speak frankly. You get rid of that undercurrent of competition and antagonism that poisons so many work environments, causing everyone to watch and share only the bare essentials, fearing that the "colleagues" if they fit improperly.

is a bit ' come con la decrescita: sta diventando una necessità, ma dovrebbe essere innanzitutto una scelta. Recuperare forme di organizzazione economica differenti, come le vere cooperative e le vere Casse di risparmio, è sempre di più una risposta obbligata, in tempi di crescente disoccupazione e di finanza speculativa. Ma dovrebbe essere un’affermazione totalmente libera, degna di chi non si ribella al sistema attuale perché è escluso da certi privilegi ma perché quei privilegi li rifiuta. Non è solo che li trova iniqui e quindi sbagliati. È che non sa cosa farsene.

Federico Zamboni
www.ilribelle.com
10.01.2011

Note:
1) Il 25 agosto 2010 il ministro Tremonti ha dichiarato che «robe such as 626 (the law on safety at work) are a luxury we can not afford. Italy are the European Union that must adapt to the world. " Later it is safe to say that his real target was the mold and excessive bureaucratic controls, and safety at work is "an essential achievement of Western civilization."

Courtesy of "The Voice of the Rebel"

The Voice of the Rebel is a monthly magazine - registered at the Court of Rome,
Authorisation No. 316, September 18, 2008 - published by Maxangelo
srl, Via Trionfale 8489, 00,135 Rome. Partita Iva 06061431000
Director: Valerio Lo Monaco
All rights reserved 2005 - 2008, - ilRibelle.com - RadioAlzoZero.net
License SIAE for RadioAlzoZero No. 472/I/06-599
Privacy ROC Registration - Register of Communications Operators - number 17,509 of 6/10/2008

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Tracfone Internet Settings

SABATO 29 L'ASSEMBLEA PER LA PALESTINA PRESENTA:

Thursday, January 20, 2011

The Synthesis Of Protein Is An Anabolic Process

SABATO 22 GENNAIO


Sabato 22 Gennaio dalle 21 SCIAMANO SHAKALLO PACEFATTA TRAKECHè
ARCO PAISIELLO G18 OLD CITY TARANTO

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Coach Purse Store Job

Serres Sottoguda - Temple of Nature

Friday, January 7, 2011

How Does A Gay Sauna Work

La Bamba by Accordion - playing with the accordion

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Wording For Out Of Town Baby Shower

biwe MUSICA DI STRADA


Saturday, January 8 from 21 the neighborhood committee of Taranto present: MUSIC STREET ..
Punk-Rock-Alternative-Folk-Blues with
UMBERTO AND UNCLE BOB ROCK

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Side Effects Of Splenda And Sweet 'n Low

Using Video SLR

Use a camera to shoot video is a trend that is gaining ground recently. Actually use a DSLR to do video that has its benefits are certainly not to be underestimated.

First I state that, in my opinion, a camera is a camera makes photos and video. At the moment so I'm still skeptical in saying "I take a camera to do video." But let a moment to analyze the reasons why we have this interesting new solution to shooting video.

I think for many the most valuable benefit is the money. In fact, these cameras (which record in full HD and also with a framerate of 60fps) have sensors larger than any similarly priced camera with a light and noise, which we watch from afar. The second advantage lies in the objectives (interchangeable), the depth of field is much narrower, and then you create a look more "film". Perhaps these are sufficient conditions for a purchase of an SLR to do videos, but need to evaluate and ask one other thing: I do the video thing? If the answer is: documentaries, short films, corporate videos and promotional videos could also agree made to use a DSLR. The use of these should preferably always be accompanied by a "real" camera. If you want to do with the filming set is not tested (see weddings or sporting events, etc.) I do not think it's a good solution for several reasons. First, they have a DSLR autofocus (in some there is only one manual) that can not certainly be the height of a video recording. The ergonomics is not the best and the inability to direct the screen (with the exception made for some, see Canon 60D) limits its potential. In addition, you should always take pictures with slow movements and not too jerky that may help you get the video rolling shutter (in short, distort the image). Not to mention that they are just micro microphones ... .. luckily there's the entry MiniJack 3.5 mm from the ability to connect external mic.

Ultimately I think I'll get an SLR for the filming of some projects (plus I also need to take pictures:-P), see Video Tours and shorts, but always alongside my beloved Canon HFS100.

that 2011 bring many many new videos and joy to you all.

Matthew